Search for: "In Re Steel Products, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2013, 5:43 am
Chumley used Google AdWords to target General Steel, e.g.: “General Steel buildings – Steel framed buildings | Armstrong Steel ... [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 11:53 am
ESPN Productions, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
/Direct Forest Products Inc., Opposition No. 91210215 [Opposition to registration of SMART CLOSET for "modular storage systems, namely, shelves units, cabinets, rails, doors, shelves, poles, clothes bars, drawers and drawer units, being installed in wardrobes or any other room of a house, office or garage," on the ground of lack of bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce].February 23, 2016 - 2 PM: In re Fullscreen, Inc., Serial No. 85951468 and… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
The undisputed false statements include statements that General manufactures steel, steel buildings, and products like automobile rims (in fact, General manufactures nothing and only serves as a seller of others’ products); that it has a storied history dating back more than 50 years (when, in fact, that history belongs to a different entity with a similar name); and so on. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:26 am
[Requirement for disclaimer of the word STEEL in the mark shown below, for "Steel products, namely, steel sheets and coils. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
July 12, 2022 - 1 PM: In re Responsiveads, Inc., Serial No. 88453313 [Refusal to register ResponsiveAds for advertising, marketing and promotional services and for marketing software, on the ground of mere descriptiveness and lack of acquired distinctiveness.] [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:17 am
Jacobson Products Co., Inc., 514 U.S. 159, 34 USPQ2d 1161, 1163-64 (1995) and Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
State Fish Co., Inc. (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 671, 690; Shadow Traffic Network v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:36 pm
(Phillips Midwest/Phillips Fasteners LLC) (USA)Dragon Iron Factory Co., Ltd.Easylink Industrial Co., LtdFaithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.Hilti, Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 4:24 pm
The controversial permit for BP Products North America Inc., that IDEM just renewed expired Feb. 28, 1995. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 11:15 pm
In re General Technologies, Inc., Serial Nos. 77052472 and 77052485 (July 23, 2009) [not precedential].Of course, the Supreme Court has told us that a single color cannot be an inherently distinctive mark. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:52 am
August 28, 2019 - 10 AM: In re Kitz Corporation, Serial No. 79221711 [Section 2(d) refusal of TOYO & Design for "iron and steel" in view of the registered mark TOYO KAHAN for, inter alia, iron and steel].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note: Any predictions? [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 12:57 pm
This time, I look at PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
It’s five times stronger than steel but a fraction of its weight. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:52 am
April 6, 2016 - 2 PM: In re Openings, Serial No. 86044043 [Section 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of the product configuration shown below, comprising a U-shaped channel that runs the full length of a door at its top and bottom, for "metal doors, commercial reinforced steel doors" and for "non-metal doors"].April 7, 2016 - 10:15 AM [ABA Annual IP Law Conference, Bethesda, Maryland]: Nash-Finch Company v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
American Steel & Wire Corp., 2014 WL 3674678, at *2 (Ga. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:19 am
In re Florists’ Transworld Delivery, Inc., Serial No. 77590475 (March 28, 2013) [precedential].Section 2(e)(5) Functionality: In M-5 Steel Mfg. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
" Owen Steel Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
October 6, 2022 - 2 PM (In Person): In re Wave Neuroscience, Inc., Serial No. 88796139 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of NEURO WAVE for medical products and services relating to the analysis and treatment of analysis and treatment of neurological disorders.] [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:38 pm
Steel Corp., 730 F.2d at 1467-68;In re Deutsche Bank, 605 F.3d at 1378. [read post]
