Search for: "In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum"
Results 21 - 40
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, 1346 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
” The parties mistakenly treated the Court of Appeals’ mandate as having reopened the original divorce case and tried to re-litigate matters, even attempting discovery proceedings and issuing several subpoenas duces tecum. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
S. 683, 702 (1974) (pretrial subpoenas duces tecum); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 696 F. 3d 428, 432 (CA5 2012) (grand jury subpoenas); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 616 F. 3d 1186, 1201 (CA10 2010) (same). [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:00 am
You'll need to pay a fee and complete a Subpoena Duces Tecum and an Application and Order to Appear for Examination form. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
Zitter, Annotation, Availability under Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings of Subpoena Duces Tecum, 7 A.L.R.4th 836. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
This morning, the Washington Post reported that the Justice Department sought to prevent former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates from testifying before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election. [read post]
Prosecutors’ Foregone Conclusion Argument Against Fifth Amendment Opposition to Decrypting Computers
23 Mar 2017, 8:34 pm
” In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Mar. 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, n. 19 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeals of Minnesota: State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1341 at 1345. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1341 at 1345. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
This can be true `whether under a search warrant or a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 2:23 pm
The 11th Circuit’s Precedent Doe’s position relies in large part on an 2012 11th Circuit decision by Judge Tjoflat, In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, that applied the foregone conclusion doctrine in a somewhat similar way. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
Criminal law -- Discovery -- Appeals -- Certiorari -- Where defense had issued subpoenas duces tecum to various third parties without permission of trial court and without notifying state of its intent to issue the subpoenas, and state, upon discovering that the subpoenas had been issued, filed a motion to compel production of all evidence produced pursuant to the illegal subpoenas, state is not entitled to writ of certiorari to have appellate… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
These types of conflicts, of course, are not unprecedented.[23] For example, U.S. courts for many years have had to determine whether to enforce (via contempt citations) U.S. grand jury subpoenas seeking documents, despite claims by the recipients of those subpoenas that compliance would violate foreign laws, such as bank secrecy laws.[24] Some decisions have rejected arguments that it is “unfair to require the [recipient of the subpoena] to be put in the… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In re Grand Jury Duces Tecum, supra. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
Subpoenas Are Improper Some federal district courts view Rule 45 subpoenas as inappropriate discovery tools for parties[12] and persons under the control of parties. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
They’re drafted in odd ways that probably miss their intended targets. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:59 am
The prosecutor said the two conditions he requested were based on documents “`provided in discovery, delivered by MySpace to the District Attorney's office pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
