Search for: "In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum"
Results 81 - 100
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 11:28 am
It bears noting, too, that the subpoenas duces tecum issued through the Alaskan state court were presumably without legal force in Massachusetts, where Egilman resided and was served. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:12 am
” The parties mistakenly treated the Court of Appeals’ mandate as having reopened the original divorce case and tried to re-litigate matters, even attempting discovery proceedings and issuing several subpoenas duces tecum. [read post]
16 May 2007, 6:36 am
The documents were later produced to opposing counsel in response to a subpoena duces tecum served on the expert. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
” The parties mistakenly treated the Court of Appeals’ mandate as having reopened the original divorce case and tried to re-litigate matters, even attempting discovery proceedings and issuing several subpoenas duces tecum. [read post]
Prosecutors’ Foregone Conclusion Argument Against Fifth Amendment Opposition to Decrypting Computers
23 Mar 2017, 8:34 pm
” In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Mar. 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, n. 19 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 2:23 pm
The 11th Circuit’s Precedent Doe’s position relies in large part on an 2012 11th Circuit decision by Judge Tjoflat, In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, that applied the foregone conclusion doctrine in a somewhat similar way. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
Criminal law -- Discovery -- Appeals -- Certiorari -- Where defense had issued subpoenas duces tecum to various third parties without permission of trial court and without notifying state of its intent to issue the subpoenas, and state, upon discovering that the subpoenas had been issued, filed a motion to compel production of all evidence produced pursuant to the illegal subpoenas, state is not entitled to writ of certiorari to have appellate… [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:43 am
What’s more, a subpoena duces tecum can require a party to produce documents, but it can’t require a party to create one. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
., The Common Interest Rule, supra (quoting In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F.3d 910 (U.S. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:56 am
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992, 1 F.3d 93 (`production may not be refused [i]f the government can demonstrate with reasonable particularity that it knows of the existence and location of subpoenaed documents’). . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:59 am
The prosecutor said the two conditions he requested were based on documents “`provided in discovery, delivered by MySpace to the District Attorney's office pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 145 F.3d 1422, 1424-25 & n.2 (D.C.Cir. 1998)(“[i]f the plaintiff’s cause of action is directed at the government’s intent, however, it makes no sense to permit the government to use the [deliberative process] privilege as a shield”). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
This morning, the Washington Post reported that the Justice Department sought to prevent former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates from testifying before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
Judge Sirica had rejected Nixon’s motion to quash the Special Prosecutor’s subpoena duces tecum for the tapes. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 5:20 pm
In January 2019, when GSK served ZW with its subpoena duces tecum, ZW through her own counsel moved for a protective order, supported by ZW’s affidavit with factual assertions to support her claim to be not subject to the deposition. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1341 at 1345. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1341 at 1345. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
.), Montréal, 500-09-023938-137Décision de : Juges Marie-France Bich, Jacques Dufresne et Dominique BélangerDate : 13 mai 2014 RECOURS COLLECTIF — procédure — administration de la preuve et audition — subpoena duces tecum — annulation — production de documents — représentant de chaque groupe — membres — dossier médical — chose jugée — pertinence —… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
They’re drafted in odd ways that probably miss their intended targets. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
It noted that in the OIG's investigation, subpoenas duces tecum had produced upwards of 300,000 pages of documentary evidence, but no evidence of actionable collusion. [read post]
