Search for: "In Re Swanson" Results 41 - 60 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 10:54 am by Dennis Crouch
”  Id., at 9, citing to In re Swanson, 540 F.3d 1368, 1377-78 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 12:43 pm by Matthew Landis
And Ron, if you’re reading this, I hope I’ve managed to change your mind about item number one on your list. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:27 pm by Zosha Millman
We’ve got an unseasonably sunny day in Seattle today, but I hear we’re not the only ones enjoying warm weather. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Swanson, 540 F.3d1368, 1377 (Fed. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 1:53 pm by Kim Krawiec
As I said at the time: We’re trying out something new at Duke next (2011-12) academic year that I wanted to float by Lounge readers. . . . [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Kara Swanson: there is a patent story here too. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 1 | Ellen Goodman (Rutgers), Moderator  Access and Development: The History of ‘Development’ and WIPOSara Bannerman (McMaster University)Commentator | Christopher S. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Froomkin
This is the race with the most candidates, making the events most difficult – they’re not real debates, and every candidate only gets to speak in short intervals – just 2 minutes for an answer, and a minute for a response. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]