Search for: "In Re United States District Court for Dist. of Colo."
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 11:15 am
”); see United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Jan. 12, 1987), federal district courts held that the rule precluded pharmacist liability. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Although the officers testified that Keith continued to threaten their safety even after he was handcuffed, and that they exercised considerable restraint in their use of force, the district court accurately identified significant discrepancies and omissions in their respective accounts of the altercation. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Avon State Bank, David Gibson, a man who purported to be the son of a business associate of Ambrose Herdering, a customer of Avon State Bank, sought out the assistance of Herdering in moving the estate of Gibson’s deceased father from the Netherlands to the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
More Nonsense on Differential Diagnosis The Supreme Court recently addressed differential etiology in Matrixx Initiatives, in stunningly irrelevant and errant dicta: “We note that courts frequently permit expert testimony on causation based on evidence other than statistical significance. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
See, e.g., In re Welding Fume Prods. [read post]
