Search for: "In Re V"
Results 1 - 20
of 62,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2010, 3:46 am
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 ”In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:09 am
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 “In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not… [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Here: Oklahoma Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills Tribal Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills The Tenth Circuit previously abated this matter pending the outcome in Michigan v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:16 pm
Read more » The post Mitigation and Offers of Re-employment: Fredrickson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:25 am
The White Cliffs of Dover Author Walter Mittelholzer 1894-1937 Jane Lambert Trade Marks Registry (Ms A Skilton) Re VERA LYNN, Lynn v Halewood International Brands Ltd, BL O/766/19 12 Dec 2019 Dame Vera Lynn was born in 1917 and is still going strong. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:19 pm
From: Bankruptcy law discussion list [mailto:BANKR-L@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU] On Behalf Of Alan Wenokur Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 5:04 PM To: BANKR-L@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU Subject: request for amicus briefs in 9th circuit re Stern v Marshall The 9th Circuit has asked for amicus briefs... [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:16 am
In re Overnight Ltd Goldfarb v Higgins and Another Chancery Division “The cause of action for fraudulent trading under section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 accrued on the making of the winding-up order. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:07 am
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP1547 In re the marriage of: Miheve v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:40 am
This opinion will not be published. 2010AP392 In re the marriage of: Stumpner v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:06 am
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP1846 In re the marriage of: Smith v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:09 am
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP1544 In re the marriage of: LeDuc v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:22 am
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP2837-FT In re the marriage of: Mastrodonato v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:30 am
This opinion will not be published. 2010AP10 In re the marriage of: Baldocchi v. [...] [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:21 am
In a rather significant development in the TTAB's fraud jurisprudence, the Board has re-designated as precedential its decision in Zanella Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 9:39 am
The post Lawyer Ben Sansone on the McGraw Show re: Sunshine case v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Fairbanks v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP2564 In re the marriage of: Ar-Rahmaan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 1:39 am
In re Overnight Ltd; Goldfarb v Higgins and others; [2009] WLR (D) 49 “The cause of action for fraudulent trading under s 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 arose on the day the winding up order was made and not when either the petition was presented or the provisional liquidator appointed. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:38 am
In Alpine Entertainment Group v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Barrett v Bem; In re Lavin, decd [2012] EWCA Civ 52; [2012] WLR (D) 17 “A court should not find that a will had been signed by a third party at the direction of the testator unless there was positive and discernible communication (which might be verbal or non-verbal) by the testator that he wished the will to be signed on his behalf by the third party.” WLR Daily, 31st January 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
