Search for: "In Re V" Results 141 - 160 of 62,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2014, 1:00 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Episode 9 of the Class Re-Action podcast is now published (a bit earlier in the day than usual). [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:22 am by John L. Welch
If you are not a Twitter subscriber, you missed these recent TTABlog tweets and re-tweets:click on photo for larger pictureB&B Hardware seeks Supreme Court review of 8th Cct decision denying any preclusive effect to TTAB decision: http://davidgryce.wordpress.com/2013/09/24/ttab-v-federal-district-court-issue-preclusion/ …Capital City Mumbo Sauce: We’re Keeping Our Name “Until Someone Beats Down Our Door”… [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:44 am by Jeremy Telman
We give it a bit more prominence by re-posting it here. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:50 am
In litigation, the '647 patent survived an invalidity challenge-->Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:16 am by Lesley Harrold
BIC UK Ltd v Burgess [2019] – employer appeal successful: retrospective amendment re-wrote history to an impermissible extent The Court of Appeal (CA) has unanimously ruled that a retrospective amendment to the deed and rules of the BIC UK Pension Scheme (the Scheme) was invalid. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:53 pm
Noonan -- The Supreme Court today granted certiorari to the patent applicants in the In re Bilski case, an en banc decision from the Federal Circuit last fall. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:48 am by Patrick Hindert
What are the critical questions for defendants (and your insurers and your re-insurers and your attorneys) resulting from the proposed settlement of the Spencer v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:48 am
(my underlining) VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd v BMW Plastics Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 593 '); //--> [read post]