Search for: "In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The full publication is available here. [1] R (KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC [2] Section 72A(1) Pensions Act 2004 [3] Section 77(1A) Pensions Act 2004 [4] Section 77A Pensions Act 2004 [5] See, In re Vitamin Antitrust Litig., 2002 WL 35021999, at *28 (D.D.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:29 am by Scott R. Anderson
On Tuesday Nov. 14, the Solicitor General filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, an international antitrust case that raises important questions about international comity and the interpretation of foreign law. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
August 13, 2013) Among other points, the text observesIn re: Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 216 F.R.D. at 172 (corporation is obligated to produce one or more Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses who are thoroughly educated about the noticed deposition topics and facts known to the corporation or its counsel).As to the matter of facts, can the Court order that a party depose a fact witness INSTEAD OF a 30(b)(6) witness? [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Robert E. Connolly
” [7] In other words, it isn’t fair to the government to have to litigate an issue where they would be bound if they lose, but the fugitive bears no risk because he can remain a fugitive if he loses. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:50 am by The CGCP Team
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s deference to China’s interpretation of its own law in a recent judgment (In Re: Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation; Sept. 20, 2016) has multiple implications. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:17 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Lawyers, surgeons make list of jobs being replaced by computersNet neutrality wins: FCC votes to classify Internet as a public utility  Legal Ethics and Social Media: What Pre-Litigation Advice May an Attorney Provide to His or Her Client? [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
’” (quoting In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 209 F.R.D. 251, 262 (D.D.C. 2002)). [2] See, e.g., Wachtel ex rel. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
’” (quoting In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 209 F.R.D. 251, 262 (D.D.C. 2002)). [2] See, e.g., Wachtel ex rel. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
’”) (quoting In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 209 F.R.D. 251, 262 (D.D.C. 2002)). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
’”) (quoting In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 209 F.R.D. 251, 262 (D.D.C. 2002)). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Blood: No, they’re not planning to stop—they’re just ignoring the lawyer. [read post]
Class representatives and their counsel in the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation have won another initial round in their suit alleging that Chinese vitamin C manufacturers conspired to fix prices and to limit the output of vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:56 am
The manufacturers did not meet the burden of proof for the foreign sovereign compulsion defense, and their motion for summary judgment based upon that defense and the related doctrines of comity and act of state were denied.The case is In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,779; [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The case is captioned In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, 05-CV-0453 (E.D.N.Y), and is pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. [read post]