Search for: "In Re Vox Populi Registry Ltd."
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2022, 8:14 am
Substantial evidence supported the Board’s finding that consumers would view the standard character mark .SUCKS as a non-source identifying part of a domain name and the Board did not err in finding that the stylized form of .SUCKS failed to create a separate commercial impression to support registration (In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., February 2, 2022, Dyk, T.). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:48 pm
Ltd., 609 F.2d 655, 663 (2d Cir. 1979); In re Kwik Lok Corp., 217 U.S.P.Q. 1245, 1248 (T.T.A.B. 1983). [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 9:19 am
IN re Vox Populi Registry Ltd. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 5:49 am
In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., Appeal No. 2021-1496 (Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:47 am
" In In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., 25 F.4th 1348, 2022 USPQ2d 115, at *3 (Fed. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:13 am
" In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., Serial Nos. 86700941 and 87187215 (October 29, 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 3:59 am
” [In similar rulings, the Board found that the following terms fail to function as trademarks: GOD BLESS THE USA for pillows; PAST PRESENT FUTURE for t-shirts; and TEXAS LOVE for t-shirts].In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., , 2020 USPQ2d 11289 (TTAB 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., 2020 USPQ2d 11289, *4 (TTAB 2020). [read post]
