Search for: "In Re Wal-Mart Employee Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2011, 7:31 am
Wal-Mart decision reversed certification of a class of approximately 1.5 million current and former Wal-Mart employees, partly on grounds that litigating the claims of a class so large would be unwieldy. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm
In re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litig., No. 2:06-CV-00225-PMP-PAL, 2008 WL 3179315, at *13 (D. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 9:16 am
In addition, during the subsequent litigation Wal-Mart delayed in responding to various information requests. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:34 pm
Wal-Mart, --- F.3d --- (9th Cir. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
The implications for antitrust cases are significant and evident from decisions such as In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 552 F.3d 305 (3d Cir. 2009), In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litig., 522 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 2008), and Blades v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:20 am
“I think that either way Wal-Mart will have to do an equal amount of preservation, because they will still have to anticipate litigation from all the individuals even if they don’t all individually wind up filing claims against Wal-Mart. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 9:07 am
Either way, for Wal-Mart, it’s still a mountain of litigation. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:04 am
Wal-Mart litigation. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:19 pm
" Companies like Wal-Mart are so big, with so many employees in different locations, that it is nearly impossible for any one employee to learn of and compile the vast evidence necessary to prove her case or to make an impact and bring about major institutional reform through an individual lawsuit. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:46 am
Since then, the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:48 pm
Feb. 20, 2013), was filed by present and former female Wal-Mart retail store employees who were former members of the Dukes class. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
Wal-Mart, 564 U.S. __ (2011). [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Wal-Mart, 131 S. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
“We are pleased that the Supreme Court has granted review in this important case,” Wal-Mart said in a statement. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:34 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 1:16 pm
Maechtlen As we predicted here and here, the plaintiffs' class action bar is increasingly focused on re-booting their class action stratagems in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
” Wal-Mart, 131 S. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm
” Wal-Mart, 131 S. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:07 am
” Wal-Mart v Dukes. [read post]
