Search for: "In Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am
The light bulbs used at the Columbian Exhibition at Chicago in 1893 were all Westinghouse bulbs and the electric power was the AC of Westinghouse and Tesla. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
Criminal malefactions dot almost every decade – General Electric and Westinghouse in the electric company conspiracies; Armand Hammer and George Steinbrenner for violation of election contribution laws, Charles Keating and the S&L crisis, Ivan Boesky and Michael Milkin in the eighties, WorldCom and Enron in the early years of this decade, and the finance sector as a whole in the new century. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
It is a story of corporate maneuvering and high-stakes litigation, as Thomas Edison and [p. 1894] his competitors employed patents as weapons in their battle to dominate the electrical industry. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:26 pm
Inst. of Technology, 129 F.3d 681(1st Cir. 1997); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
It is my great pleasure to pass along the announcement of the publication of Joel Slawotsky's excellent article: "The National Security Exception in US-China FDI and Trade: Lessons from Delaware Corporate Law" which appears in the The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 6(2):228–264.In this new era defined by the re-creation of global regional economic blocks--one centered in China, and the other in the United States, the issue of national interest in the areas… [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
Supreme Court weighed in on the issue in Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Westinghouse Electric Corp., 522 S.E.2d 424, 432 (W. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
Because six of the appellee corporations are Pennsylvania-based, Pennsylvania can certainly be viewed as possessing a legitimate interest in ensuring that Pennsylvania companies do not manufacture or distribute hazardous products which cause injury. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The court threw out a lot of claims but not all of them.We're going to go through Guinan I first, but quickly (yeah, right, we know you guys), because it's necessary to understand Guinan II - the one we're most interested in.The remaining claims in Guinan I were malpractice (medical negligence), informed consent, fraud/misrepresentation, and medical monitoring.The first question was choice of law. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
The police report further indicated that Piontkowski was going to re-interview plaintiff and then forward the matter to the New York State Insurance Frauds Bureau. [read post]
