Search for: "In Re in the Interest of Warren"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2020, 11:01 pm
“So you're going to pay for people who didn't save any money and those of us who did the right thing get screwed,” replied the man in an infuriated tone.Recall the debate between Biden and Warren about bankruptcy. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 11:25 am
Although LHB readers ISO others for ASLH panels should feel free to leave comments on this post, we're happy to post the following from Earl Maltz, Rutgers Law:I am interested in putting together a panel commemorating the 50th anniversary of the end of the Warren Court for the 2019 meeting of the ASLH. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 4:07 pm
A side note on Professor Warren. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:02 pm
Today, Megan McArdle started on what is a less interesting political topic, but a more interesting one for this blog with a long and detailed post on Elizabeth Warren taking on then-Professor Warren’s use of theory and data in the Two Income Trap and her controversial work on medical bankruptcies. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
So, for example, if you wanted to hedge your risk against interest rates rising, you might decide to pay a bank $3 million every half-year, and in return they would pay you $100 million multiplied by an agreed-upon interest rate (usually Libor). [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 9:32 pm
How interesting! [read post]
3 May 2014, 10:33 am
But we’re probably not there now. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 3:21 pm
And Warren is one of the few public figures rising to the moment with real integrity and with the public interest at heart. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:19 pm
Weisenthal knows, or at least he thinks he does.We're pretty sure the PPIP is totally dead. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:49 pm
") and for caring that the interests of taxpayers are represented in the whole TARP process ("The people who are subsidizing the activities of the banks through their tax dollars are the same people who are furnishing the high profits through consumer lending," Warren told the Wall Street Journal "In a sense, we're asking taxpayers to pay twice. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 1:54 am
One of Warren's questions asked about the contrast between the investment America makes in its educational system and the investment it makes in its "we're number one! [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 11:33 am
Nelson discusses therein the use of nunc pro tunc orders, and where and when they're appropriate. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 5:58 am
” Obama, up for re-election, apparently cannot afford to alienate powerful business interests despite his campaign promises to voting consumers. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 6:01 pm
[fn2] I go through this history in my article Paying for Gun Violence, if you’re interested in a little more detail. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 8:37 am
They become nonsensical because they're unable to distinguish between what is and isn't interesting, and what is worth noting and what isn't.... [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:20 am
“And here’s the kicker: They’re right. [read post]
30 May 2020, 11:39 am
Bravo Senator Warren! [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 11:57 am
” – Warren Buffett. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 11:28 am
” Today we’re looking at Future Claims—Elizabeth Warren Edition. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:25 am
Elijah Cummings (D-Md) re-introduced the Financial Services Conflict of Interest Act which they had pushed in the last Congress as a means of curbing the so-called revolving door between high-level federal government jobs and Wall Street. [read post]
