Search for: "In re: A&D Interests" Results 1 - 20 of 24,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 1:58 am by tracey
In re an application by the General Dental Council (Savery and others, interested parties):[2011] EWHC 3011 (Admin);  [2011] WLR (D)  332 “The General Dental Council was under no obligation to obtain an order of the court for permission to use and disclose dental records of patients for the purposes of investigating allegations of professional misconduct against a registered dentist even where the patients in question objected to the… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:41 am by PJ Blount
Res. 1150: Designating the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as a National Security Interest and Asset was introduced on March 9, 2010 by Rep. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Loss of momentum from Iowa was critical, but you really can't criticize the decision not to start there earlier: she'd have taken a drubbing if she'd made her move there before she locked up her Senate re-election. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:19 am
In re P [2009] EWHC 163 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 41 “When making decisions about the property and welfare of persons lacking capacity, the overarching principle pursuant to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was that any decision made on behalf of that person must be made in his best interests. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:43 pm by Uthman Law Office
Court discretion under 1170(d)  Penal Code section 1170(d)(1) states: “The court resentencing under this paragraph may reduce a defendant’s term of imprisonment and modify the judgment, including a judgment entered after a plea agreement, if it is in the interest of justice. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:25 am by John Jascob
Elijah Cummings (D-Md) re-introduced the Financial Services Conflict of Interest Act which they had pushed in the last Congress as a means of curbing the so-called revolving door between high-level federal government jobs and Wall Street. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:25 am by John Mattox
Before doing so, be sure that you’re an “interested party” under GAO’s regulations. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:00 pm by Lynne Butler
If you'd like to check it out, click here, then scroll down to page 26. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:12 pm by Law Lady
Some interesting developments in the health law and insurance areas:H Res 1188 ( Griffith, D-AL), ensuring an up or down vote on certain health care legislation; to Rules. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:19 am by Cathy Moran
Personally, I’d rather be earning compound interest than paying it. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:34 pm by Uthman Law Office
B301267) 2020 WL 5810212, at *1 Resentencing under Penal Code 1170(d)(1) Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(1) authorizes the trial court to modify a defendant’s sentence upon a recommendation from the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Department), the Board of Parole Hearings, or the district attorney to “recall the sentence and commitment previously ordered and resentence the defendant in the same manner as if they had not previously… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:30 am by Unknown
Tonkovic, J.D.In its first open meeting of 2023, the SEC unanimously approved the re-proposal of a 2011 rule prohibiting certain conflicts of interest in the context of asset-backed securities. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
That is why the decision of Re D’Angelo Estate, 2010 ONSC 7244 (CanLII) caught my attention. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:47 am
In re Stanford International Bank Ltd and others [2009] EWHC 1441 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 230 “The ‘centre of main interests’ for the purposes of the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 must be identified by reference to factors which were both objective and ascertainable by third parties. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:49 am by sally
In re Stanford International Bank Ltd (in liquidation) [2010] EWCA Civ 137; [2010] WLR (D) 55 “The centre of main interest of a company, for the purposes of recognition of a foreign main proceeding in cross-border insolvency proceedings, was to be identified by reference to factors which were both objective and ascertainable by third parties, not by applying the head office functions test. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:39 am by traceydennis
In re Guardian News and Media Ltd and others [2010] UKSC 1; [2010] WLR (D) 13  “Where individuals challenged freezing orders made against them under the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 and the Al-Qaida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 the general public interest in publishing a full report of the proceedings in which they were named justified curtailing their right to respect for their private and family lives. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:43 am
I have now seen a short report (citation: [2008] All ER (D) 55 (Apr)), and I think it is of interest, particularly regarding the relationship between shared residence and contact.Briefly, the facts were that the child spent approximately 60% of his time with the mother and 40% with the father. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:54 am by sally
In re E (Children)(Abduction: Custody Rights) [2011] UKSC 27; [2011] WLR (D) 191 “The application of article 13b of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980) required that the best interests of the child concerned was a primary consideration for the court requested to return an abducted child and, consequently, there was no conflict between the Hague Convention and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and no… [read post]