Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation"
Results 101 - 120
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
Maya is an all-too-familiar litigation tourism situation. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
Id. at 1313.A classic "type one" mass tort example of the "you failed to warn about something else" claim arose in In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation, 331 F. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Examples are not driving a riding lawnmower parallel to a slope (because you’ll tip over) or only handling asbestos while using a respirator (because breathing asbestos can do nasty things to you). [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
What we quarrel with is admitting asbestos-style rank hearsay for product identification purposes.In a busy week, one can expect pain pump litigation to contribute its share, and it did. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The important divide between regulatory practice and the litigation of causal claims in civil actions arises from the theoretical nature of the risk assessment enterprise. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Mar. 26, 2007); In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 48 Misc. 3d 460, 483-484 (Sup. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
” In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 1995 WL 428683, at *1-2 (E.D. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am
The result, in our view, is to subject defendants to full joint-and-several liability for injuries and fatalities in the absence of any reasonably developed scientific reasoning that would support the conclusion that the product sold by the defendant was a substantial factor in causing the harm. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:29 am
Then, fight like the dickens for three years.The average state statute of limitations for a product liability case is two years; after three years, the statute has expired in 42 of the 50 states. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:04 am
Essentially no one goes to trial on his own money any more.That does mean, however, that product liability lawsuits are somewhat more likely to go to trial than other cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Does insisting on that legal responsibility represent a turning point in the fight against climate change, similar to when tobacco and asbestos companies were first held liable for harm resulting from their products? [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
See In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 647 F. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
The legislature chose not to punish FDA-regulated activity, but the court nullified that legislative decision, with practically no discussion.In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Product Liability Litigation, 804 F.3d 633 (3d Cir. 2015). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Litig., 95 F. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
All of these questions would impact liability and/or damages. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The PDR compiles FDA-approved drug labeling, id. at *4 n.4 - the same sort of routine product warnings that have been the bread and butter of product liability liability litigation for decades. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn Litig., Nos. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
As far as we can tell it has not yet prevailed in any product liability action. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:57 am
Product injury firm Hissey Kientz shared a steady stream of news related to the drugs that have injured their clients, including Zofran, Xarelto, and Viagra; the firm also reported on Russia and India’s plan to block the UN’s proposed ban on asbestos exports (asbestos causes a deadly form of cancer called mesothelioma). [read post]
