Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation"
Results 101 - 120
of 206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2013, 2:35 am
If asbestos is the grandfather of mass torts, the DES litigation may be the grandmother, with claims continuing today for harm allegedly caused by in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol decades ago. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
There were lots of different asbestos products, and the same kinds of asbestos products do (or, at least, plaintiffs allege they do) have similar risks. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
June 7, 2005) – all holding that the heeding presumption is limited to strict liability and that Pennsylvania bars use of strict liability in prescription medical product litigation. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
Where are our production bottlenecks? [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[t]he reasoning in both the George and White cases is applicable”), aff’d, 44 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 1995); In re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
On the good side of the ledger, the court throws out all of the usual bread & butter claims in prescription drug product liability litigation ? [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
The second case, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, 2012 U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
MTBE Products Liability Litigation, 379 F.Supp.2d at 430. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am
However, Bugosh was an asbestos case and the only appellants were intermediate sellers ? [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am
Asbestos Litig., 827 F. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:16 am
Amid litigation and federal probes, insurance companies are left scratching their heads over how to price the risk of the oil and gas production technique now better known as fracking. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:56 pm
In In re Aredia & Zometa Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 2015791 (M.D. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am
The result, in our view, is to subject defendants to full joint-and-several liability for injuries and fatalities in the absence of any reasonably developed scientific reasoning that would support the conclusion that the product sold by the defendant was a substantial factor in causing the harm. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
See also In re Asbestos Prods. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am
such as the asbestos-related issue in O’Neal can get their attention ? [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:49 am
Bexis doesn’t limit his product liability horizons to drugs and devices ? [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:06 pm
So, if standards of proof could just be lowered the class action mechanism would expose potential defendants to existential liability risks for harms they probably didn't cause (see pg. 6) so that vast sums could be extracted from them and the production of synthetic chemicals would be thereby curtailed or eliminated. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Business Group Propaganda is Polluting the Product Liability Issue. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Business Group Propaganda is Polluting the Product Liability Issue. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
” Kurns, 2012 WL 631857, at *4.T’ain’t no field preemption in prescription medical product liability litigation. [read post]
