Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation" Results 121 - 140 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Weitz & Luxenberg has fought a lot of uphill battles in asbestos litigation and won. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Her decedent had been a heavy smoker for many years, and he had been exposed minimally to asbestos in his office job on the property of an asbestos product manufacturing plant. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
  The consolidation is an attempt at a Rule 23(c)(4) single-issue class certification without the class action – since class actions are never certified anymore in personal injury prescription medical product litigation (as demonstrated here). [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm by Michael Grossman
Almost regardless of what we’re doing, we perspire. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
In addition to pharmaceutical cases, the MDL Panel has considered cases involving wage and hour litigation, airplane crashes, train wrecks, hotel fires, asbestos, securities and financial fraud, antitrust, and patent cases. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
In addition to pharmaceutical cases, the MDL Panel has considered cases involving wage and hour litigation, airplane crashes, train wrecks, hotel fires, asbestos, securities and financial fraud, antitrust, and patent cases. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:04 pm
Job Title: Senior ParalegalEmployer: Rhodes, Hieronymus, Jones, Tucker & Gable, PLLC, Tulsa, Oklahoma.Years of Paralegal Experience: 18+Specialty Areas: Insurance defense including medical products liability and medical malpractice, vaccine litigation, nursing home litigation, asbestos litigation, toxic torts, and dram shop liability.Career Highlight: A partner I closely work with represents individuals, especially children, who have suffered… [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am by admin
Ignorantia facti is not an excuse for someone who argues for a radical re-ordering of an already fragile litigation system. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am by Schachtman
Ignorantia facti is not an excuse for someone who argues for a radical re-ordering of an already fragile litigation system. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 8:01 am
As regular readers of this blog know, the dynamics of products liability litigation can change in a heartbeat if the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the "MDL Panel" or "Panel") grants (or denies) a motion to centralize related cases in a single district court. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
  See also In re Asbestos School Litigation, 46 F.3d 1284, 1294-96 (3d Cir. 1994) (First Amendment precluded product liability action). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Ayers, 538 U.S. 135, 156-57 (2003) (reaffirming Metro-North in dictum); In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation, 534 F.3d 986, 1009-10 (9th Cir. 2008) (no medical monitoring with respect to nuclear radiation); Syms v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:27 pm
" The answer, of course, was no.So it looks like our Buckman analysis might have practical benefit in defending against post-Riegel claims after all.Getting preemption protection for products prospectivelyWe confess (boy, do we confess) that we're not FDA regulatory lawyers. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:42 am by Chip Merlin
Unfortunately, a recent opinion, In re: Chinese Manufactured Drywall: Products Liability Litigation, issued December 16, 2010, did not rule in favor of the first party policyholders.The Federal District Court Judge set out the Louisiana rule regarding interpretation of insurance contracts: An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed by using the general rules of interpretation of contracts set forth in the Louisiana… [read post]