Search for: "In re: Christopher Wills" Results 1 - 20 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 10:25 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" Christopher Seaman (Chicago-Kent Law) addresses this question in Willful Patent Infringement and Enhanced Damages After In re Seagate: An Empirical Study (forthcoming in the Iowa Law Review). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:22 am by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
Seaman, "Willful Patent Infringement and Enhanced Damages After In re Seagate: An empirical Study" (link) [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 10:45 am by aling
“If you’re willing to accept it as OK, then think about what this would mean if this were done to you. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:59 am by Josh Wright
Christopher Sprigman is Professor or Law at the University of Virginia Christopher J. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 3:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  If you’re running a company, you need to spend your capital on things that are relevant to your business mission, not diverting that capital to lawyers. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
If my landlord isn’t making improvements, should I withhold rent until they’re made? [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:53 pm
Here, it appoints Christopher Hu, an attorney at Horvitz & Leavy. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Buce
Trying to sort out something to say re: this morning's reading. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 pm
You're listening to Episode 131 on Tuesday, October 7th, 2008. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Christoph Meyer, Professor of European and International Politics, King’s College London This article was originally published on The Conversation. [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
If you’re looking to read some other compliance-related stories this weekend, these are some that recently caught my attention. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:47 pm by Stewart Baker
I suggest that maybe the only people willing to read Intercept articles to the end are federal agents trying to find clues to the leakers' identities; whatever they're doing, it's working. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 4:09 am
A victim must be between 14 and 17, a willing participant, and can be no more than four years younger than the offender. [read post]