Search for: "In re: G-I Holdings, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 12:20 pm
I previously blogged the taxpayer's attempt to have the district court reconsider its decision in In re G-I Holdings, Inc., 369 B.R. 832 (D.N.J. 2007), based on affidavits to be supplied by Senate Finance Committee staffers on the meaning of a tax transition rule: Can Congressional Staff Testify on Meaning... [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
(“Murray Energy”), which is the ultimate parent company of Met Holdings. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:38 am
In the Agreement, Tempnology had granted Mission Product Holdings, Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 12:30 am
In re Google Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:43 am
”);Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
§ 102(g); Mahurkar v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:52 am
I know what you're thinking... [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm
This was attempted in the In Re: G-I Holdings case cited above. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:38 am
In the Agreement, Tempnology had granted Mission Product Holdings, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
New York.February 23, 2018.Natalie Jean-Baptiste, Plaintiff, pro se.NCO Financial Services Inc & Access Group Inc., Defendants, represented by Michael G. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:03 am
In making this decision, he appears to part ways with In re G-I Holdings, Inc., 313 B.R. 612, 628 (Bankr. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:31 am
§ 101.9(g)(4)(i) and, thus, Olivenol was being sold in violation of 21U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:34 am
Judge Richard G. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm
Thus, the court focused on one allegedlyobvious embodiment of claim 6, namely, “a ready-to-use,sealed glass container—made from Type I glass and acoated rubber stopper—with 4 µg/mL dexmedetomidineHCl,” which the court referred to as the “4 µg/mL preferredembodiment. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:33 pm
The district court premised both holdings on deference to our prior decision in Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., 595 F.3d 1340 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:12 pm
§ 101.9(g)(4)(i). [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
§ 1396r-8(g)(1)(B)(I). [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
Arkison (In re Bellingham Ins. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:55 pm
See Exxon Research & Eng’g v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 5:36 am
Bombardier Inc., 2014 SCC 35. [read post]
