Search for: "In re: Mendez v." Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
Finally, we're also dealing with a trial court that was really throwing the book at the guy -- who could easily have made the sentences concurrent, but instead made 'em consecutive as a means of ensuring that Mendez never, ever walked out of prison.So an unusual case. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:56 am
Your lawyers are telling you that you're going to be convicted, and are explaining why. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:23 pm by Steve Kalar
And if you’re forced to fight Mendez-Sosain the immigration context, explore the real factual ambiguity underlying this new Ninth holding. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am by Rory Little
” The Mendezes respond that, in fact, the court has suggested (in a different Fourth Amendment context, Kentucky v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claims against Sultan and the Asher defendants are barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767 [1st Dept 2016] [affirming, inter alia, summary dismissal of legal malpractice claims]). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:09 am by Russ Bensing
Last week, in State v. [read post]