Search for: "In re: Nomination Petition of Josephs (Per Curiam Order)"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: Conviction affirmed, but resentencing is in order. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
The citation to Wells was clearly wrong in that the plaintiffs in that case had, in fact, relied upon studies that were nominally statistically significant, and so the Wells court could not have held that statistical significance was unnecessary.[1] The two other cases cited by the Supreme Court, however, were both about “differential diagnosis,” and had nothing to do with statistical significance. [read post]