Search for: "In re: Peer Review Action."
Results 1 - 20
of 919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 6:24 am
Mikos, 539 F.3d 706, 711 (7th Cir. 2008) (noting that the absence of peer-reviewed studies on subject of bullet grooving did not render opinion, based upon FBI database, inadmissible); In re Zoloft Prods. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:09 am
So long as the peer review action meets HCQIA’s requirements, failure to comply with bylaws would not defeat immunity. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:09 am
So long as the peer review action meets HCQIA’s requirements, failure to comply with bylaws would not defeat immunity. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:09 am
So long as the peer review action meets HCQIA’s requirements, failure to comply with bylaws would not defeat immunity. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 10:10 pm
Andrew Schrock has a puff piece ("Opening Up the Patent Process") on peer-to-patent in the MIT Technology Review. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:58 am
May 31, 2011) (“recognizing a medical peer review privilege in a FTCA action” in light of PSQIA); KD, 715 F. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
The peer review process, while generally delegating responsibility to the private sector to monitor the professional conduct of physicians, establishes minimum protections for physicians subject to adverse action in the peer review system. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
The peer review process, while generally delegating responsibility to the private sector to monitor the professional conduct of physicians, establishes minimum protections for physicians subject to adverse action in the peer review system. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:00 pm
Reviewers will rank submissions so PTO examiners can review the prior art deemed most relevant by the community. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:27 am
That includes among its review categories, “insurance carriers/peer review doctors – potentially includes the quality of peer review reports and the appropriateness of actions taken based on peer review reports. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
Word of mouth is a great way to learn about the latest training trends and events, and when our peers speak highly of something, we’re more inclined to trust their judgment. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:31 am
Once the peer-review begins, it will continue for a three-month period. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:30 am
The scheduling and obtaining of independent medical evaluation or a peer review. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
In ruling on disruptive physician cases, courts almost always rely on Meyers , and it has been cited repeatedly in other disruptive physician cases to justify a hospital or medical staff's peer review actions disciplining the physician. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:25 pm
Finally, the standard deviation on the 2012 peer review was extremely high and the re-review by the three member committee resulted in a split decision. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
In ruling on disruptive physician cases, courts almost always rely on Meyers, and it has been cited repeatedly in other disruptive physician cases to justify a hospital or medical staff's peer review actions disciplining the physician. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 7:27 pm
Take that away and we're left to what peer reviewers do or don't do when they're confronted with substandard care by one of their own. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:29 am
The Court focused its analysis on an exception in the statute: If a judge makes a preliminary finding that a proceeding or record of a medical peer review committee or a communication made to the committee is relevant to an anticompetitive action, or to a civil rights proceeding brought under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Moreover, law review editors are picking their peers—other students with whom they will work in the coming academic year—or selecting the authors with whom they themselves will interact. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Chen warned that as long as the Court reviews the validity of administrative actions without considering an administration’s discriminatory intent, administrative actions will continue to have racially discriminatory effects. [read post]
