Search for: "In re: Procter & Gamble Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
As the judge noted, both issues are interconnected and the second cannot succeed if infringement is found.Legal principles for registered designsMr Justice Carr reminded everyone of the guidance from Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited [2007] EWCA Civ 936; [2008] Bus LR 801 and repeated and expanded by the Court of Appeal in Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1206; [2013] Bus LR 328.In particular:(i) Registered design cases are concerned… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
As the judge noted, both issues are interconnected and the second cannot succeed if infringement is found.Legal principles for registered designsMr Justice Carr reminded everyone of the guidance from Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited [2007] EWCA Civ 936; [2008] Bus LR 801 and repeated and expanded by the Court of Appeal in Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1206; [2013] Bus LR 328.In particular:(i) Registered design cases are concerned… [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:12 pm
Marc Pritchard, Chief Brand Officer of Procter & Gamble Co. has been a vocal advocate of media transparency issues, stating earlier this year that “the days of giving digital a pass are over … It’s time to grow up. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:12 pm
Marc Pritchard, Chief Brand Officer of Procter & Gamble Co. has been a vocal advocate of media transparency issues, stating earlier this year that “the days of giving digital a pass are over … It’s time to grow up. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:31 pm
See also Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:42 pm
Gardner has lived and worked on four continents, including positions with McKinsey & Co. and Procter & Gamble, and as a Fulbright Scholar. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 9:33 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 105 Cal.App. 4th 496, 507 (2003). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:38 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 77 F. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
Cir. 2014) and In re Procter & Gamble Co., 749 F.3d 1376, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:37 am
Procter & Gamble Co., --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2015 WL 5781541, No. 14–CV–4090 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
So far many plaintiffs have had trouble coming up with factual support to back such allegations – and sometimes we’re not even sure why they’re making them. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Procter & Gamble Distributors, LLC, 766 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:42 am
’” Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:29 pm
Apr. 24, 2014). [6] In re Procter & Gamble Co., Misc. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Proper disclosures can manage this risk.A Historical FTC Perspective: Advertorials, Infomercials, and Paid Endorsement Lesley Fair, Staff Attorney, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC Settlement: FTC settled with Munsen Specialty Co., in vol. 1 of FTC decisions, 1917—deceptively promoted high tech product through content that didn’t look like ads. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
