Search for: "In re: Procter & Gamble Co." Results 61 - 80 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2016, 9:33 am by Ad Law Defense
Procter & Gamble Co., 105 Cal.App. 4th 496, 507 (2003). [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:24 am
Loftin, discussed here), or from post-trial juror interviews (as in the recent Procter & Gamble/Amway verdict), or from articles the jurors wrote (like New Jersey state senator Robert Martin), the point is what the juror said, not where he chose to say it. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm by Ron Coleman
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am by Ron Coleman
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:53 am by Jayne Navarre
The authors also go on to tell of companies such as Boeing, BMW, and Procter & Gamble that have been around for the better part of a century, and yet these organizations and their leaders have seized on collaboration and self-organization as powerful new levers to cut costs, innovate faster, co-create with customers and partners, and generally do whatever it takes to usher their organizations into the twenty-first-century business environment. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:12 pm by Douglas J. Wood
  Marc Pritchard, Chief Brand Officer of Procter & Gamble Co. has been a vocal advocate of media transparency issues, stating earlier this year that “the days of giving digital a pass are over … It’s time to grow up. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:12 pm by Douglas J. Wood
  Marc Pritchard, Chief Brand Officer of Procter & Gamble Co. has been a vocal advocate of media transparency issues, stating earlier this year that “the days of giving digital a pass are over … It’s time to grow up. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
Pylon: Jettisoning the presumption of irreparable harm in injunction relief (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC: BPAI’s ex parte decision based upon new factual findings constitutes a new ground of rejection: In re Stepan Co. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
When combined with the substantial proposed re-write of the HSR notification requirements announced last month,[2] the impact on merging parties will likely be significant additional time and expense needed to achieve antitrust approval generally and a tendency toward greater opposition to deals that have seemingly limited impact on relevant markets. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  So far many plaintiffs have had trouble coming up with factual support to back such allegations – and sometimes we’re not even sure why they’re making them. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
  France Paris Appeal Court: Che Guevara’s portrait: an icon, not a trade mark (Class 46)   Germany German banks move towards deal on patent collateralisation (IAM) Munich Regional Court dismisses actor/comedian Michael ‘Bully’ Herbig’s trade mark and personality rights infringement case against Take Two Interactive over ‘Bully – Die Ehrenrunde’ computer game (Class 46) Polar bear Knut and the ‘big… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]