Search for: "In re: Sealed Case (AMENDED REDACTED OPINION)"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
We REMAND for sealing in accordance with this opinion. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
The latter relied on precedent: FISCR’s opinion in In Re Sealed Case. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:57 pm
Selya, was extraordinary in several respects: It was partly redacted, and it referred to court pleadings that remain sealed. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
The issue of sealing records from public view:In its sealing motions, Uniloc asked the district courtto seal most of the materials in the parties’ underlyingbriefs, including citations to case law and quotations frompublished opinions. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit held In re Sealed Case, 832 F.2d 1268 (D.C. cir. 1987), that due process/minimum contacts limitations apply in the context of criminal subpoenas, as Judge Williams reasons in the In re Grand Jury opinion. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:25 am
In making its decision whether to grant a request to seal or redact, a court must analyze each individual search warrant and supporting record, consider alternatives to sealing or redaction, and make precise, fact-spe [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:14 am
" … [At a later hearing, t]he court stated that there was "no doubt" that public access and the First Amendment were a "priority," but that, "in regards to domestic relations cases, there's also no doubt that there are certain situations that can overcome or that are even more important, one of which is the best interest of the children that would lead to some sort of redaction or sealing. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:16 pm
Unlike In re Sealed Case, In re Directives is redacted in several areas. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
Magistrate Judge Stephen Smith's opinion in In Re Sealing is persuasive, and his conclusions regarding the 1st Amendment rights at issue when a gag order is issued are correct. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
[The opinion was decided July 21, but was originally issued sealed; it was just unsealed today, in response to my motion to unseal.] [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
" In re U.S. for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
For purposes of this opinion, the details of the investigation–which remain under seal on the Court's docket–are irrelevant.. . . [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
A federal appellate court has held the same as to secret grand jury information that was disclosed in a court hearing (In re Charlotte Observer (4th Cir. 1990), vacating a similar injunction on First Amendment grounds). [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:16 am
(Such sealed court orders and opinions are only very rarely allowed, and even if there is confidential information that needs to be kept private, redaction, as below, is seen as a much preferred alternative to outright sealing.) [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
"We're still in the process of reviewing it," he said. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:49 am
Blackwell further argues that the sealing of the records was done procedurally and substantively in violation of Sixth Circuit case law, specifically In re Knoxville News-Sentinel Co. (6th Cir. 1983). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:54 am
The decision in that case was published in redacted form at In re Directives Pursuant to Sec. 105b of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 551 F. 3d 1004 (Foreign Intel. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
§ 1983, for retaliating against her for exercising her First Amendment right to free speech. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:17 am
We’re also disappointed in Apple. [read post]
