Search for: "In re: Stein" Results 21 - 40 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 10:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Klopfen-stein, 380 F.3d 1345, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Citing the Bush v Gore SCOTUS decision, Judge Goldsmith found that Stein had demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim that further delay of the voter re-count would violate her fundamental constitutional right to a presidential vote under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 12:30 pm
Dreier Stein & Kahan is bucking the trend of shortening law firm names. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 9:47 pm
  Hackett and Stein have created an initiative within ACC to explore ways to re-define the relationship in-house GC's have with out-house firms. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by Jon Hyman
Often, I hear this outrage from clients: “I can’t believe we’re being sued for this. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 12:07 pm
"It's great that we're combining a great deal of political clout and strengthâ€â [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 5:50 pm
In addition, Livengood has an article headlined "Stein seeks to disqualify 2 justices in recount case" that begins, "Green Party candidate Jill Stein wants two Republican-nominated justices on the Michigan Supreme Court disqualified from considering a lawsuit seeking to stop the election recount because they're on President-elect Donald Trump's U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 2:47 pm by Buce
--I mean, with other pianos, you're never sure the voicing will be right. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:01 pm
  While we’re considering issues of race, gender, [...] [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:09 am by support
The post 5 Questions to Ask Before You Retain a Personal Injury Firm appeared first on Stein & Shulman, LLC. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:05 pm
" City Journal has today posted online an essay by Harry Stein that begins, "Mention the name Charles Pickering to anyone but the most committed news junkie, and you're apt to get a blank look or, at best, one of dim recognition. [read post]