Search for: "In re: Tam"
Results 21 - 40
of 757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 12:35 pm
’” In re Geller, 751F.3d 1355, 1358 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Tam’s intent could be different tomorrow. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am
And that’s where they will stay, to die the ignominious death they deserve — especially because, if In re Tam is indeed upheld by the Supreme Court, no one will have the slightest interest in the topic of trademark registrations besides trademark lawyers, registrants and law professors. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:43 am
Here is the opinion in In re Tam: In re Tam An excerpt: Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act bars the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) from registering scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Tam and his group themselves wanted to try to reverse the term’s denigrating connotations.) [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:55 pm
When All You Have is a Hammer, Everything Looks Like a NailIn re Tam and the Federal Circuit's Conflation of Federal Trademark Registration and the First AmendmentDrew Jurgensen In December 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) issued an en banc decision in the In Re Tam case. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:58 am
In re Simon Shiao Tam (on petition for a writ of mandamus) (Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
The post DOJ Intervenes in Qui Tam Action Against Lance Armstrong appeared first on Tycko & Zavareei LLP. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Although the Justices posed tough questions and intricate hypotheticals to both sides, the tone of each Justice’s questions and their individual jurisprudences indicate an even 4-4 split, with Justices Breyer, Ginsberg, Kagan, and Sotomayor favoring the USPTO, and Justices Alito, Kennedy, Thomas, and Chief Justice Roberts favoring Tam. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 9:50 am
I’ll be speaking about In re Tam but don’t worry, there [...] [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:53 pm
Government's cert. petition in In re Tam https://t.co/PPoaT0euup @theslants #trademark #freespeech — Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) April 20, 2016 [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
" After decades of frustration, the First Amendment argument against Section 2(a) finally prevailed, as In re Tam explicitly overruled any support that clause might have found from In re McGinley. *** While In re Tam did not directly confront the immoral and scandalous clause, it confirmed the theory that Section 2(A) is flawed, and cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog… [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
However, the In re Tam case beat the REDSKINS team to the high court. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 6:30 am
Cir.) issued a decision last December in In re Tam, an appeal filed by Simon Tam to overturn the TTAB decision. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:41 am
In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit... [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:19 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Tam (Fed. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
They’re tasty, but just not as sweet as that candy bar. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:38 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a ruling issued today in the case captioned In re Simon Shiao Tam. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, we're conducting our own audit, but don't want to alarm them unnecessarily. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit issued a unanimous decision (In re Tam) holding that the mark THE SLANTS was properly refused registration because it is disparaging to people of Asian descent. [read post]
