Search for: "In re: Taylor, et al" Results 61 - 80 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm by Roshonda Scipio
[et al.].Cambridge [U.K.] ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2013.K3240 .G539 2013 Internet LawThe legal protection of databases : a comparative analysis / Estelle Derclaye.Derclaye, Estelle, 1974-Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar, c2008.K1443.D37 D47 2008 JapanThe rule of law in Japan : a comparative analysis / Carl F. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am by Roger Clegg
By the way, the social-science evidence that there are compelling educational benefits that outweigh the costs is underwhelming, as discussed in the amicus briefs filed in Fisher by Abigail Thernstrom et al., Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., Gail Heriot et al., the Pacific Legal Foundation et al., (including my organization), and a group of economics and statistics scholars. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
  (Psalm 63:3)Re: [web2py] web2py 2.0.2 is out Alec Taylor 8/30/12 12:44 AM Thank you kindly! [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
  Then, a few days later, the Federal Circuit considered and rejected a recent patent claim in dough in In re Jason Arthur Taylor et al. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by KC Johnson
"Once again: Tyson does not challenge in any way the data that Arcidiacono, et al., presented, that black students at Duke disproportionately migrate away from more difficult (science and engineering) to easier (liberal arts) majors. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Texas et al. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am by Schachtman
Ware, et al., “Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials,” 357 New Engl. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:08 pm by Charon QC
(b) Needless to say, we are encouraging competitor lawyers to *engage* – a word for our times -  on twitter et al and, using the #FF hashtag our operatives have suggested quite a few serial tin foil hat wearers for our competitors to follow – with remarkable take up. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
It talks about legal standards, and its logic is interesting (note: if you're bright, you'll be able to tell what parts of the opinion could just as easily gone the other way if the Court had so chosen). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
City of Los Angeles et al, CV 07-5556 GHK - that Tesha Taylor-Ewing's constitutional and civil rights were violated in April 2006, when Officer Jose Castaneda clamped on the cuffs "in an improper and excessively tight manner" despite her cries of pain - which he ignored for half an hour. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Several of my liberal friends and colleagues have opined over the last few days that the Democrats got trounced on Tuesday because Obama, Pelosi et al., were insufficiently progressive. [read post]