Search for: "In re: USA, et al" Results 41 - 60 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 9:33 am by Geoff Schweller
Read the SEC’s press releases on the case: SEC Charges Penny Stock “Mailman” With Scalping Investors In Gold Mining Stocks Brian Robert Sodi, et al. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Dean et al. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
But sometimes they’re deadly. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
An early example of Lorenzo having an impact (albeit short-lived) in private litigation is In re Longfin Corp Sec. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:30 am by Don Cruse
Granite Operating Company and Apache Corporation, et al. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” 18A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERALPRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 4419 (3d ed.) [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Avanci et al. case) to a couple of cases in which Continental AG, the German parent company of Michigan-based Continental Automotive Systems, allegedly "prevailed on the argument that it cannot be served through [Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.] [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm by Chris Castle
Other relevant reading should include Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale, Andreassen et al (2012). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Ben
The case is Saint-Amour et al v The Richmond Organization Inc et al, U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:58 pm by Scott Hervey
Comicmix, LLC et al., which involved a copyright infringement lawsuit over a Star Trek and Dr. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:13 am by Kevin Kaufman
The creation of universal savings accounts (USAs) would help people to save. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]