Search for: "In re A.C.-1"
Results 1 - 20
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2010, 3:55 pm
& A.C., a 2-1 decision yesterday... [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:44 am
Pemsel, [1891] A.C. 531:(1) the relief of poverty; (2) the advancement of education; (3) the advancement of religion and (4) certain other purposes beneficial to the community, not falling under any of the preceding heads.Mr. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am
Gramophone Co., [1909] A.C. 488 (H.L.). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 3:48 am
September 12, 2016 - 11 A M: Luxco, Inc. v Consejo Regulador del Tequila, A.C., Opposition No. 91190827 [Opposition to registration of TEQUILA as a certification mark for "distilled spirits, namely, spirits distilled from the blue tequilana Weber variety of agave plant," on the ground that the mark fails to serve as an exclusive indicator of geographic origin].September 13, 2016 - 10 AM: In re NTVB Media, Serial No. 86174087 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness… [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:27 am
Syllabus paragraph 1.) [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:03 pm
” N.J.S.A. 3B:1-1. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
Consejo Regulador del Tequila, A.C. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
”) (I)(1)(lists disqualifying offenses) In re Willis, 2002-Ohio-4942 (3rd Dist.) [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:56 pm
Commissioners for Special Purposes of the Income Tax Acts, [1921] 2 A.C. 1, 125 L.T. 250, decide. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:30 pm
And, more to the point, there is no reason to reverse and remand for a further inquiry, which would not only entail effort and expense, but would also delay permanency for A.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:19 pm
The Queen, 1 A.C. 304 (1969) Silver v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:17 am
(They’re still friends.) [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Defendant again sought vacatur of the reinstated judgment, and over State Farm's opposition this time, Queens Civil vacated the twice reinstated default judgment.The Appellate Term REVERSED and reinstated the default judgment, holding:A party seeking to vacate a default judgment must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; see also Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
Cir. 2005), reversed, 550 U.S. 398 (2007); A.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:44 am
Justices Longmore and Sales (who were minded to dismiss the appeal) relied heavily on Parry v Cleaver [1970] A.C.1, in which it was held that benefits do not fall to be taken into account, even if caused by the breach, where it would be contrary to fairness and justice. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 2:58 pm
Cherokee Nation (Cherokee Nation Supreme Court Rules) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html In re A.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
In re Custody of A.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
Feb. 1, 2013). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:37 am
The High Court and the Court of Appeal refer to guidance on the Article 13(b) exception given by the Supreme Court in Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27; [2012] 1 A.C. 144, including as to the potential relevance of protective measures. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
Causes Ct.); Foote Estate (Re), 2011 ABCA 1, [2011] 6 W.W.R. 453.[21] The questions here are whether or not Dr. [read post]
