Search for: "In re Acknowledgment Cases" Results 41 - 60 of 11,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 5:59 am by Steve McConnell
One of their negligence claims in the case was grounded on res ipsa loquitur. [read post]
The EU Commission’s rejection of the Hairdressers’ Agreement as well as the decision in European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission, Case T–310/18, 24 October 2019 come to mind. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:06 am by Steven Boutwell
Therein, Judge Fallon acknowledged the limitations of Townsend and the re-affirmation of Miles, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims for punitive damages for negligence and unseaworthiness. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC affirmed the PTAB in the case In re Gee:Ex Parte Gee, No. 2012-001041, 2014 WL 1446589 (P.T.A.B. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:50 am
Fingerprint evidence as a result of an illegal seizure in an illegal re-entry case would not be suppressed. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 5:10 am
 On March 26, 2007, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari to a case directly stemming from In re Charter Communications. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:37 am by Florian Mueller
Now, they're not actually asking the court to lower Apple's 30% cut, but they say they want to be permitted to offer alternative in-app payment methods and they want alternative iOS app stores to be allowed to compete with Apple's App Store, with the ultimative objective of bringing down that percentage. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review [2015] UKSC 42 on whether the ECHR, art 8, was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:37 am by The Health Law Partners
The criteria, referred to as the Gating Criteria, was developed by the Trump Administration as a safeguard to ensure only those areas with low COVID-19 cases and/or incidence are part of the first phase to re-open the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 3:06 pm
Such a defence does not ‘re-start’ the 12 year period. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
  The reasoning in Estate of Young was approved by the Court of Appeal in Hadley Estate (Re), 2017 BCCA 311, aff’g 2016 BCSC 765. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:36 am by Dennis Crouch
The USPTO has posted a notice acknowledging the Federal Circuit’s decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:54 am by MBettman
On August 31, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of In re: (C.C.S.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In his last will and testament executed December 18, 2008, the decedent recited that, prior to his marriage to Irene, they entered into an ‘antenuptial agreement dated July 26, 1984,’ and that ‘[t]he bequests to and other dispositions for the benefit of [Irene] contained in this Will [we]re made by [him] in recognition of and notwithstanding said antenuptial agreement. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:39 am by Nicole Bürli
Each time the case was re-opened it was the same investigator, who had closed the investigation before, questioning her and then closing the investigation again. [read post]