Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 16" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
ENDNOTES [1]     SEC Administrative Proceeding No. 3-21829 (Jan. 16, 2024), https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2024/34-99344.pdf. [2]     17 CFR §240.21F-17 (2011). [3]     SEC Administrative Proceeding No. 3-21829 at 3 (Jan. 16, 2024), https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2024/34-99344.pdf. [4]      SEC Administrative Proceeding No. 3-21829 at 4 (Jan. 16, 2024),… [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
P. 8019(b)(3). 1 Tagnetics appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s October 25, 2019 “Order Granting in Part Tagnetics’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 101) and Ordering Other Matters” (the “October 25 Order”). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
However, Rembrandt later learned that J&J’s expert had testified falsely and the Federal Circuit ordered the case re-opened under R.60(b)(3) that empowers district courts to revisit final judgments after a showing of “fraud …, misrepresentation, or misconduct by the opposing party. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
 70223 (admin proc Aug. 16, 2013) (undertaking "[f]or a period of five years from the date of this Order" to "not engage in or participate in any unregistered offering of securities conducted in reliance on Rule 506 of Regulation D"). [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:40 am by Giles Peaker
The entry for 16 May 2016 reads: “client being rehoused by LWF 16/5/2016. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am by Frank Cranmer
Colton J upheld the challenge to the current arrangements under the Education and Libraries (NI) Order 1986. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
 These findings of fact will make it easier for the CJEU to make a decision;although the Defendants' required the reference to be as soon as possible in order to achieve business certainty for their startup the Defendants had also made a request for a stay which was inconsistent with their purported desire for immediate certainty.The own name defence question may become relevant if SkyKick wins in relation to the UK mark but loses in relation to the EU mark but it could just as… [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Drug Enforcement Admin., 105 F.3d 112, 114-16 (3d Cir. 1996); Bastien v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
On receipt of this additional information, the Acting Chancellor[**] set aside the original order in so far as the objector was not deemed to have a “sufficient interest” in the petition, Re St. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
The CAF assessment was neither well informed on the housing position nor well considered, but did conclude (to housing dept) “may your department possibly re-open the housing application in respect of [J]. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
But irrespective of the context, if you’re speaking on AI, you too must ensure that you do so in a manner that is not materially false or misleading. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:23 am by Douglas Reiser
Can Job Order Contracting Be Used on New Public Construction Projects? [read post]