Search for: "In re Answers Corp. Shareholders Litigation" Results 41 - 60 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Allowing for an interlocutory appeal here would allow the Court of Appeals to answer this threshold legal question at the outset and potentially avoid the expenditure of further resources by the Court and the parties. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
”[9] Maintaining this balance is especially important because it is shareholders who “ultimately bear the burden” of meritless litigation.[10] Congress Passes the Reform Act By the 1990s, private securities litigation had gotten out of control. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The answer at this stage is unclear, as these manuscript products are largely untested in the courts. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    For instance, after suffering a cyber-attack, a corporation must not only bear the substantial regulatory and litigation costs associated with potential privacy violations – that is just the tip of the iceberg. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Yes, it is time to answer all those emails and return all of those phone messages. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:07 pm by Nate Nead
Understanding who is/was on the board, who are/were shareholders and who is/was an officer of the organization is helpful if any of the other listed items hit the fan: you’ll know who to go to directly to ask questions and get answers. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  And the changing character of those interactions will only be definitively resolved after the fact in litigation. [read post]