Search for: "In re Answers Corp. Shareholders Litigation"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
Lubin Austermuehle’s Oak Brook and Chicago shareholder oppression lawyers have over thirty-five years of experience litigating complex class action, consumer rights, and business and commercial litigation disputes. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
As articulated in two pre-M&F Worldwide decisions (In re Cox Communications Shareholders Litigation, and In re MFW Shareholders Litigation, C.A. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 11:43 am
Shareholders Litigation, [Current] Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Shareholders Litigation, 789 A.2d 14 (Del. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 am
Litig., MDL No. 2342; 12-md-2342, 2014 U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
But at least in one case, the answer is "yes. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:04 am
Wrong answer. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 10:30 am
In those actions, it seems, the parties will be allowed to re-litigate whether class certification is appropriate, while the lawyers who personally satisfied their pre-lawsuit invesigation duties will have one, and only one, shot at class certification. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
And the changing character of those interactions will only be definitively resolved after the fact in litigation. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:02 am
The answer can be quite surprising. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:36 am
Shareholder Derivative Litig., 964 A.2d 106, 122 (Del. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:14 am
Plaintiffs lawyer Stuart Grant says the answer has too often been no, with courts denying shareholders the right to pursue malpractice claims against auditors. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
Shareholders Litigation, 789 A.2d. 14 (Del. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Perinni Corp., 37 F. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am
Short Answer The Court of Chancery reasoned that collateral estoppel would not apply, and motions to dismiss based on Rule 23.1 and Rule 12(b)(6) were both denied. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
The Court distinguished the decision of In Re 3COM Corp. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm
See McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm
One answer from one search, even if it seems to be “on point, on all fours,” may foreclose consideration of other crucial corporate governance disciplines. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The next day, with allegations Langford was “freezing” him out of StaxxRing, Adams answered the lawsuit; asserted affirmative defenses of fraud, unclean hands, and estoppel and quasi- estoppel; and counterclaimed against Langford for fraud, conversion, and shareholder oppression, requesting damages, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees. [read post]
