Search for: "In re Application of Keller"
Results 1 - 20
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2007, 12:21 pm
"Critics say religious conservatism gripping the applicant pool makes it too difficult to discern potentially dangerous zealots. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
In fact, the CCA had re-affirmed the use of bite-mark evidence as recently as 2012. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:41 pm
One of my recent replies read, "Applicant does not disagree with the well-established principles set forth by In re Keller. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 11:19 am
From the Commission on Judicial Conduct's website, here are links to all documents filed with the commission in the case: In re: Judge Sharon Keller (Judge No. 96) Notice of Formal Proceedings (file stamped) [pdf]Judge Keller Answer [pdf] Exhibits: A-B [1.07 MB pdf] | C-D [309 KB pdf] | E [2.18 MB pdf] | F-H [752 KB pdf] | I-K [372 KB pdf] | L-P [1.29 MB pdf] Agreed Request for Setting [pdf]Order Setting Hearing [pdf]Appointment of Special Master [pdf]First… [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 10:18 am
” In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
See also In re Keller, 642 F.2d at 425 (“The testfor obviousness is not whether the features of a secondary reference may bebodily incorporated into the structure of the primary reference. . . . [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm
On the other hand, as the Information Commissioner has argued, rigid public private distinctions limiting the application of FOI law need to be re-considered in light of the widespread outsourcing of public services through private or not-for-profit bodies. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:34 am
Presiding Judge Keller dissentd without an opinion. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 2:11 am
Secondly, non-traditional publishers may do not want to be remunerated for re-use of non-significant fragments taken from their websites since their business models are based on traffic or because they are interested in sharing their writings as widely as possible. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:28 am
See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981)(“The test for obviousness is not whether the features of a secondary reference may be bodily incorporated into the structure of the primary reference; nor is it that the claimed invention must be expressly suggested in any one or all of the references. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
Wilson, 249 S.W.3d 425, 426 (Tex. 2008) (citing City of Keller v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:26 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413,425 (CCPA 1981) (citations omitted). [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:49 pm
Sharon Keller did. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:57 am
Even Judges Keller and Keasler thought so.Further, Judge Keller believed Pue's lawyer performed ineffectively:Because the conviction was not final regardless of what law applies, and because Applicant has no other prior convictions (aside from the two in California), I would hold that counsel was deficient for failing to challenge the use of this conviction for enhancement purposes, and Applicant was prejudiced because his thirty-year sentence exceeds the… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
Keller: ADR? [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:26 pm
” In re Gurley, 27 F.3d 551, 553 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:49 am
Cir. 1985) (en banc); see also In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413 (CCPA 1981) (stating "[t]he test for obviousness is not whether the features of a secondary reference may be bodily incorporated into the structure of the primary reference"). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:41 am
This week, in preparing for a class session on right of publicity, I re-read the recent 9th Circuit case of Keller v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Well, Lichtblau does bend over backwards to exonerate the Times and its editor, Keller. [read post]
