Search for: "In re Application of Ohio Power Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2006, 6:38 am
Co., 2006-Ohio-2578.Lucas App. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
(U.S.S.C., June 25, 2018, Ohio v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
” (…) See also Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 07 CO 39, 2008-Ohio-5051 (ex post facto, retroactivity, separation of powers, cruel & unusual punishment, due process, double jeopardy, no law) State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
This court has always held that Article I, Section 9 of the Ohio Constitution and the Eighth Amendment are co-extensive—there is no case law where the analyses of the two diverge. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
In re Estate of Pittston, 2009-Ohio-1862 (5th Dist.) [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
In a case with similar facts, In re Mullen, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled against the lesbian co-parent. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:43 pm
Co., 473 F. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
On June 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Boone Coleman Construction Co., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Nobody marched up to Grendell and said "you're a petty, totalitarian thug" to his face. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Nobody marched up to Grendell and said "you're a petty, totalitarian thug" to his face. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
Re-Enforcing A Fundamental Principle The court isn’t going to re-write a valid contract provision. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
They're not as powerful as straight preemption, but in some situations they might have more appeal.The first of these is what we call judicial deference. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
In re Estate of Shipman, No. 26512, 2013 S.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 9:02 am
Their patent application had been filed BEFORE December 1903, and had nothing to do with powered flight, but rather with three dimensional control of flight, powered or unpowered. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
”) In re Nowak, 2004-Ohio-6777 (“[t]he proposition that the one-subject rule is both directory and potentially capable of being applied by the court to invalidate a law is essentially an oxymoron. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
Justice Kennedy takes the opportunity to state that the court has long considered the protections of its Due Course of Law Clause to be co-extensive with the [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
Article I, Section 2 of the Ohio Constitution (All political power is inherent in the people. [read post]
