Search for: "In re Art T."
Results 1 - 20
of 11,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm
Nick Gillespie of Reason magazine says there are three reasons we shouldn’t be funding the arts: Public art is quickly censored art; We’re broke; and Public funding isn’t necessary. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 3:51 pm
If you're too excited and feel the urge to skip straight to buying tickets (and by all means, don't resist the urge!) [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:00 am
We’re all busy lawyers. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:06 am
If you’re ever in Motown, don’t miss it! [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
I am interested in persuasion, so I enjoyed re-reading Guy Kawasaki's book, "Enchantment: The Art of Changing Hearts, Minds, and Actions. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:19 pm
Lacking any fan art caselaw the law remains muddled and we can't predict how a court would rule. [read post]
10 May 2012, 8:55 pm
MGA Entm’t, Inc., 637 F.3d 1314, 1321 (Fed. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 1:01 pm
by Louise Carron* “Don’t worry, we’re from the Internet. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:06 am
In Re Swanson, September 4, 2008 (07-1534)In 1997, the CAFC decided In re Portola Packaging, holding that "prior art previously considered by the PTO in relation to the same or broader claims" would preclude reexamination requests on the same art.In 2002 Congress amended § 303(a) to include an additional sentence, explaining that the amendment "overturns the holding of In re Portola Packaging" and that "[t]he… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
The US analogous art test as explained in In re Bigio 381 F.3d 1320 would be accepted by most European practitioners as no more and no less than a summary of the test adopted by the EPO Appeal Boards: Two separate tests define the scope of analogous prior art: ? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:40 pm
The real art in negotiation comes in the re-framing of the other side’s negotiation point-of-view. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:38 am
They're attractive, and you won't see them in everybody's living room. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:09 pm
There are some things I don't know. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Not every claimed invention will be able to be re-patented, but there will undoubtedly be some that will be able to be re-patented. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 7:40 pm
If you’re like me, you have many friends that are either art lawyers, artists and/or art or law students. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
See In re Cygnus Tele- comms. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:29 pm
We don't normally think of casebook supplements as especially artful projects; they're just late-summer catch-alls that, at least in my field of constitutional law, try to shoehorn in the major and not a few minor decisions, usually at undue length and without much commentary, until it's time to try to restitch everyting into a Frankenstein's monster of a new edition. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 4:26 pm
You're free to use any text or imagery published before 1928. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 6:21 pm
Can’t wait to read this book! [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:02 pm
See In re Antor Media Corp., 689 F.3d 1282, 1289 (Fed. [read post]
