Search for: "In re Barrett"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Barrett v Bem; In re Lavin, decd [2012] EWCA Civ 52; [2012] WLR (D) 17 “A court should not find that a will had been signed by a third party at the direction of the testator unless there was positive and discernible communication (which might be verbal or non-verbal) by the testator that he wished the will to be signed on his behalf by the third party.” WLR Daily, 31st January 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 1:53 pm
The issue before the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Re Barrett Estate, 2003 ABQB 986 was what effect if any should be given to the three lists.The first list was easy. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 3:45 am
As Senate confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett begin, which may well prove more important and desirable to Republicans and conservatives than re-electing the repugnant yet bloated Darth Cheeto, it brings a series of opportunities. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 10:09 am
" Also at the link: The Barrett supporter who slapped Barrett in the face (for conceding). [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:46 am
They're prepared. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 5:52 pm
“I think it would be a good idea for us to do it, particularly so that we can communicate to the public exactly what it is that we’re doing — and in a clearer way than perhaps we have been able to do so far,” Barrett said. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 12:07 pm
Barrett, St. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
(unfortunately, right when we’re teaching!) [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:13 pm
If they refer to “trolleys,” they’re thinking that this is an idea from the 1950s and they oppose it. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 5:00 am
But we’re still at the starting gate of this battle, even as the soothsayers have already condemned her for reversing Roe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 10:10 am
And so that is something I think that they’re likely to address. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
We're being asked to rely on the decisions that will come from the mind of this nominee. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
” Trump has refused to explicitly commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses his re-election bid. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:21 am
(The Court also issued a one-line per curiam in In re Grand Jury, dismissing that case as improvidently granted.) [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:17 am
Barrett v Bem (No 2); In re Lavin, decd [2011] EWHC 1247 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 171 “Section 15 of the Wills Act 1837, which made a gift to an attesting witness ‘utterly null and void’, did not extend to a beneficiary of a will who had signed a will on the testator’s behalf at his direction. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 5:52 pm
“Amy Coney Barrett’s Modest Way to End Racial Preferences; Congress outlawed racial preferences; It doesn’t matter if they’re constitutional”: Law professor John O. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:00 am
And now, for all we can see, Tom Barrett wants to re-dig the hole. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:30 am
First, you’re giving the employee what s/he wants, and what employee wouldn’t like that? [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:26 am
., In re Barrett, 549 U.S. 948 (2006) (mem.); In re Clinton, [...] [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
The other is In re. [read post]
