Search for: "In re C.J."
Results 161 - 180
of 362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
It is so ordered.POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR RE HEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.Original Proceedings–Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureHon. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:20 am
Josh compares it to the rift between C.J. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 7:40 pm
” Ex parte Jimmy Lamar Killingsworth, Jr.; (In re: Jimmy Lamar Killingsworth, Jr. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:31 pm
UPDATE: C.J. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 3:34 pm
"You're wrong," countered the Ninth. [read post]
22 May 2011, 8:28 am
May 17, 2011).Don’t bother looking for the holding in Leavitt: just wince your way through the first paragraph of C.J. [read post]
5 Nov 2005, 11:01 am
C.J. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
Sorry, you're stuck. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit (via Sutton, C.J.): Conviction and sentence affirmed. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
At the end, the decision looked like this: “ANSTEAD, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur.ANSTEAD, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion, in which PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
Shepard, C.J., concurs with separate opinion. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:21 am
Instead, he attacked C.J. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Tenn. 1963)(Taylor, C.J.) [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Is that then res judicata with respect to the other? [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
Op. by C.J. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 5:06 am
Most of the other changes we fought for were ultimately accepted, but not on the cy pres front.But lately we’re more optimistic. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:58 am
If you're a libertarian aching to claw back Congress's commerce clause authority to pre-New Deal days, this is your opinion. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 5:22 am
In Re: Delhi Laws Act [AIR 1951 SC 332], Kania C.J. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:19 pm
Hence, the Division Bench asked the counsel for the parties to restrict their submissions to the question as to whether Awasthi Construction required re-consideration. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
In re George A. [read post]
