Search for: "In re DaCosta"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 6:23 am
Advanced Microdevices, 848 F.2d 1560, 1570 (CAFC 1988)In re Nomiya, 509 F.2d 566, 571 n.5 (CCPA 1975)Separately, on a "noticed fact"MPEP 2144.03(C)37 CFR 1.111(b) [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:22 pm
"We're being tortured out here," he said.DaCosta said he had previously been ordered to live under an overpass on the Sawgrass Expressway.A court document showed that the Department of Corrections previously ordered DaCosta to live under the Oakland Park Bridge.He had no toilet, bed or even a bench. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 11:04 am
DaCosta describes the flyer thusly: "The advertisement from Health Services, calling for safe sex, reads, ‘Whether you're the catcher or the pitcher, always wear a glove! [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:42 am
See Soc’y of Human Res. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:17 pm
"We're 12 to 15 miles from the nearest bus stop. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:08 am
DaCosta and People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Dacosta, 2020 ONCA 602 (CanLII) [18] Drilling down to the practical elements, in order to provide for a meaningful right of appeal, trial judges must identify the key issues; find the facts relevant to the issues; assess credibility and reliability where there is conflict; set out the chain of reasoning; make the decision; and then write the reasons to clearly communicate the decision: Welton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School: A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
A lot of what follows is taken in more or less edited form from the amicus brief that Bexis filed with the California Supreme Court in Conte - a copy of which we're making available, here.One major problem with Conte is that the court placed form over substance. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
One of the ways we feed this blog is doing what comes naturally to us lawyers - reading recent cases - and hoping that something inspires us. [read post]
