Search for: "In re David E. (1978)" Results 61 - 80 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Pix credit HEREEthics has always been a term that is easy to pronounce, easier to segregate and narrow, and nearly impossible to produce easy answers. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by Adam Thierer
 He and Leibowitz continue: “Philosophically, we wonder if we’re moving to a post-disclosure era and what that would look like,” Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:35 am
"Lawyers look at the codification of legal services, and they're appalled by it," said David Briscoe, of Altman Weil. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
[E]xactly what speech a person knows will "tend to expose any other living person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule" may not be so easily determined in a diverse, pluralistic nation. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  Real violation claims aren’t particularly easy to plead, but they’re even harder to prove, so this is just the beginning. [read post]