Search for: "In re Dennis B." Results 101 - 120 of 466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2007, 9:14 am
As soon as A invokes religious reasons for his political position, then it has to be OK for B to challenge those reasons. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Cray, 871 F.3d at 1360 (“FederalCircuit law, rather than regional circuit law, governs[the] analysis of what § 1400(b) requires. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
The Board’s interpretation of section 315(b) effectively re-writes the statute by expanding the statutory exemption for joinder requests from a mandatory time bar to petitions. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court has completed its patent law business for the 2015 term and will re-open decision making in September 2016. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:44 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Dodocase Vr, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:55 pm
So we're back to our original format today. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 7:06 am by Dennis Crouch
” In re Katz, 687 F.2d 450 (C.C.P.A. 1982). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:05 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Section 101 has some magic to it. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:56 pm
Thank Goodness It's Friday (and we're still registered to practice before the USPTO),--Bill Heinze [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:12 pm
[Originally posted on DennisKennedy.Blog (http://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/)] Learn more about legal technology at Dennis Kennedy's Legal Technology Central page. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit has just reissued this important trademark decision as precedential. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 12:06 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch [Transcript of Oral Arguments] The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Limelight Networks Inc. v. [read post]