Search for: "In re Disqualification of Clark"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2020, 10:06 am
IN RE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, No. 20-0630 Petition filed on August 14, 2020 The petition was filed on Friday afternoon on behalf of Amy Clark Meachum, the Democratic nominee for Chief Justice. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
” “In her opinion, Kennedy cited previous examples of recusal matters in the state, namely In re Disqualification of Dezso from 2011, which established that affiants have a burden to prove that their affidavits are timely filed. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
” In re Opinion No. 653 of the Advisory Comm. on Prof’l Ethics, 132 N.J. 124, 129 (1993). [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:13 am
In re Vascular Access Centers, L.P., Bankruptcy No. 19-17117-AMC (E.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:05 am
Clark v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:51 pm
So if you're afraid you won't get a fair hearing because a judge says or does something demonstrating bias against you, you're entitled to request that he or she disqualify himself or herself. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
[In re Advisory Opinion No. 544 of N.J. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:32 am
In Clark v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:32 am
In Clark v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
If you’re reading a blog post that is entirely devoted to cases on the Supreme Court’s docket that haven’t even been granted yet, chances are you’re a law nerd. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:42 am
But Daniels’ attorney Clark Brewster at the time still had a pending complaint against Tacopina with the grievance committee, which also failed. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:43 am
” In re Silverman, 113 N.J. 193, 217 (1988). [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:49 am
RPC 1.9(a) has no relevance unless the party seeking disqualification is a “former client. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
” Perhaps, then, those arguments will be re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship from whence they came. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
They'll say that a criminal prosecution, with the full panoply of due process, requires a much higher burden of proof than a civil disqualification proceeding. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
In re Estate of Shipman, No. 26512, 2013 S.D. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:27 pm
And so, if you’re a Texas lawyer, should you. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Clarke, No. 09-1629 In habeas proceedings of a defendant convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, district court's conclusion that the state trial judge had impermissibly (though unintentionally) coerced a guilty verdict as a result of a series of voir dire examinations of individual jurors is reversed as the AEDPA's deferential standard of review controls in this case, and the district court employed an insufficiently deferential standard of review. … [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Clarke, No. 09-1629 In habeas proceedings of a defendant convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, district court's conclusion that the state trial judge had impermissibly (though unintentionally) coerced a guilty verdict as a result of a series of voir dire examinations of individual jurors is reversed as the AEDPA's deferential standard of review controls in this case, and the district court employed an insufficiently deferential standard of review. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:55 am
Some of the reasons for our recommendation are: • The proposals are seriously flawed, but they will dramatically affect Texas law practice—case-acceptance standards, attorney-client contract forms, conflicts of interest standards, disqualification, fees, billing, confidential client information, and on and on. [read post]
