Search for: "In re District Judge Kilburn"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
Based on the 92-page decision by District of Columbia Judge Emmett G. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:52 am
Wonders Merpel, is this because they're not legal or because they're not professional? [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
See, e.g., In re Welding Fume Prods. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Judge Kane apparently took a defense expert witness’s statement that ecological studies do not account for confounders to mean that the presence of confounding does not render such studies unscientific. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Indeed, this bias from inadequate control of confounding infects several pending pharmaceutical multi-district litigations. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Strassel, “He Fought the Tort Bar — and Won; Thanks to a CEO’s persistence, a federal judge discovers massive lawsuit fraud,” Wall St. [read post]
