Search for: "In re Doe, b. 11/17/94" Results 41 - 60 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am by Carolina Attorneys
On appeal, Plaintiff challenges findings of fact 8, 10, 17, 18, 20, 27, 29, 35, and 38. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The accompanying press release highlights the cooperation of the provincial government with the law society to address these unintended effects, The Ontario government is proactively working with the Law Society of Ontario to establish a program that will ensure the federal government’s Bill C-75 does not restrict paralegals, lawyer licensing candidates or law students from providing legal representation to people charged with summary conviction offences. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
” Rose does not require a formal medical record to recall how things went for her daughter over the next several days. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The payment of the appeal fee was effected with the date of 17 March 2015. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Oral proceedings took place on 11 April 2018, during which the necessity of referring one or more questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal was discussed. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
” This modified the old rules and constitutional application in which the jury or commissioners were judges of the law and the facts. 10 In re Public Highway in Elba Twp, 236 Mich 282, 284; 210 NW 297 (1926). 11 A precise discussion of the changes in the constitution appears in State Hwy Comm v Vanderkloot, 392 Mich 159, 169-176, 191; 220 NW2d 416 (1974). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The decisionThe applicant, France.com Inc, submitted the following four questions to the CJEU (para 17): ‘(i) In light of [Article] 8(2) [now Article 8(2) of Regulation 2017/1001] and Article 41(1) [now Article 46(1) of Regulation 2017/1001] of [Regulation No 207/2009] and Rule 15(2)(b) and Rule 17 of [Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community… [read post]