Search for: "In re E.Z.-S."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
In Re Baby E.Z. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
In Re Baby E.Z. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
In Re Baby E.Z. [read blog]
9 Nov 2022, 6:19 am
See, e.g., In re E.Z., No. 21 Civ. 6524 (MKV), 2021 WL 5106637, at *26 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
Rev. 2010)), and Lee wrote the first extended, self-conscious application of corpus linguistics in a court case (“In re Adoption of Baby E.Z. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
Mukasey, 540 F.3d 909, 910–11 (8th Cir. 2008) (noting Wikipedia’s acknowledgment that, “at any given moment,” an entry “could be in the middle of a large edit or it could have been recently vandalized” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)), and In re Marriage of Lamoure, 132 Cal. [read post]
