Search for: "In re Estrada" Results 61 - 80 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
“You don’t really think we’re going to go back and rip out every decision made,” Scalia said. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
One of those bars is Section 2(c).The panel majority distinguished the only case in which implied consent under Section 2(c) had been found: In re D.B. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
The President re-nominated him in January 2013, and he was confirmed in May. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:05 pm by Douglas
Doutrinadores têm defendido que o prejuízo moral que alguém diz ter sofrido é provado in re ipsa (pela força dos próprios fatos). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:05 pm by Douglas
Doutrinadores têm defendido que o prejuízo moral que alguém diz ter sofrido é provado in re ipsa (pela força dos próprios fatos). [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:54 am by Gustavo Arballo
El resultado -cuanto menor, mejor- será una aproximación a la opinión que al lector le merezca la actuación de la Corte -una opinión que tenga en cuenta todo el campeonato y no las perlitas de los resúmenes de la fecha-. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 11:04 am by John Lewis
”  Undaunted, counsel for Comcast, Miguel Estrada, disagreed, pointing out in rebuttal that Comcast told the district court “the model does not work”, “flaws preclude its use”, and that “this model is bunk”. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:47 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Mollineri – Re-torcid@s (pendiente) 12:00pm – Almuerzo 1:00pm – Blogs Gary Gutierrez – Blog de Gary Luis Ponce – Periodista Perú Erick Álvarez – abogado y escritor 2:00pm – Facebook + Twitter / Redes Sociales José Raúl Cepeda – Profesor Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico Noticias Ponce (pendiente) 3:00pm – Periodismos Culturales Aileen Estrada – Catedrática Medios y Cultura… [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:23 am
fragmentation in IEL Chair: Marion Panizzon (University of Bern) Thomas Cottier (University of Bern) and Hannes Schloemann (WTI Advisors), Re? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:26 am by Douglas
Doutrinadores têm defendido que o prejuízo moral que alguém diz ter sofrido é provado in re ipsa (pela força dos próprios fatos). [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:31 pm by Dawinder "Dave" S. Sidhu
  (I realize that Katyal was challenging the government, whereas Estrada is defending a government official. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
That doesn’t mean that the suit was “baseless” or represents “harassment,” contra Miguel Estrada, but I’ll save my gripe about that distinction for another time. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:32 pm
TOM BEARDEN: The sheriff of Santa Cruz County, Tony Estrada, shares that concern. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
  So let’s say you’re awaiting sentencing in a crack case. [read post]