Search for: "In re Graham, Petitioner" Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
As a statistical matter, we’re getting to the point that it’s time to start expecting dissents from denial in some of these cases. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
In any event, the court relisted Peruta for the first time, which is good news for petitioners’ counsel, who include former solicitor general Paul Clement. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
We’re not able to discuss them all, but we have a few minutes in our busy schedules to survey some of the contenders. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Intervenor Br. at 30(citing In re Jung, 637 F.3d 1356, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
Also, we’re lazy. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“Second, the petitioner must satisfy ‘theburden of showing that his right to issuance of the writ isclear and indisputable. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  In form, this is a new suit by the petitioner against the lower court itself, designated the "respondent. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
The attorney seeks a total fee of $6,283.87, of which $1,500.00 has been paid by the petitioner personally. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
 Wells and Ben think the government may end up with en banc petitioner’s remorse. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:28 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The petitioner is strictly limited to 50 pages unless permission is granted to exceed that limit. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm by Matthew Bush
Ct.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Associated General Contractors of America et al.Reply of petitioner Bright v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Down in DC, the Supreme Court accepted cert in a followup to its decision last year in Graham v. [read post]