Search for: "In re I.A."
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 1:43 pm
So, today I am calling for a moratorium on the term Artificial Intelligence in the practice of law (unless you are actually talking about a Turing machine that bills by the hour), because whether we're discussing Watson, Ross, Kira, or Kim, we're talking about Augmented Human Intelligence. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:58 am
The cornerstone of their proposals is the setting up of a "Senate", comparable in its role and composition, with i.a. members of the BoA, to a "Council for the Judiciary" as is common to the EPC contracting states. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
The EEOC’s more-flexible stance may give you some leeway if a mistake is made and you’re having to defend yourself in court. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:47 pm
Moreover, we're talking about groups of claims in the same application. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 7:53 am
Section I.A. of Farmers' policy contains the relevant property coverage language: SECTION I - PROPERTY COVERAGE COVERAGE A (DWELLING) We cover: 1. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
The ruling in In re I.A., Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-3155, 2012-2122, settled questions about the timing of this hearing pursuant to O.R.C. 2152.83(B)(1). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:59 am
Something to Consider Even if You’re Not a WKSI While CorpFin’s revised statement on WKSI waivers no doubt provides WKSIs with a greater degree of insight into the waiver assessment process, even non-WKSIs can glean insight from the framework in terms of understanding CorpFin’s current thinking on what constitutes a showing of good cause for purposes of a waiver request and perhaps even outside of the context of a waiver request for those issuers that a find themselves in… [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:42 am
See In re Steele, 305 F.3d 859, 862-63 (CCPA 1962).Bottom line: AFFIRMED [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Ct. 1207 (2011); In re IBP Confidential Bus. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:43 am
A recent decision from the Fourth District Court of Appeals in San Diego, In re I.A., et al, affirmed a trial court decision to remove two children from their home after the children allegedly witnessed one or more incidents of domestic violence between their parents involving weapons. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:27 pm
In section I.A., the guidance is to: “Identify and Understand Any Utility . . . [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 3:53 am
They’re not bad guys. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
The so called "useful, concrete and tangible result test" for assessing patent-eligible subject mater was later substituted by the "machine or transformation test" in the CAFC decision In re Bilski which, in turn, was rejected by the US Supreme Court in its Bilski vs. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:10 am
As described in Part I.A. above, Novartis sells its drugs to wholesalers; the wholesalers then sell them to pharmacies; and the pharmacies ultimately sell the drugs to patients who have prescriptions for them. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
Editor's Note: James Morphy is a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP specializing in mergers & acquisitions and corporate governance. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
Cir. 2007); In re Cruciferous Sprout Litig., 301 F.3d 1343, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 10:34 am
For publication opinions today (1): In Re: The Termination of the Parent-Child Rel. of I.A., Lavonne Aikens v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
As ex-plained in Part I.A., various jurisdictions have insisted that the amount of punitive damages be tethered tightly to the amount of compensatory damages awarded. [read post]
