Search for: "In re Ian C. (2001)"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
The Corte di Cassazione relied on CJEU decision in Case C-133/11 Folien Fisher v Ritrama (a case concerning unfair competition, not patent infringement) in which it was held that "paragraph (3) of Article 5 of Regulation No. 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that an action for a negative declaration seeking to establish the absence of liability in tort, delict, or quasi-delict falls within the scope of that provision".The Katpedo is… [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
David Bowie’s top must-read books The Age of American Unreason, Susan Jacoby (2008) The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, Junot Diaz (2007) The Coast of Utopia (trilogy), Tom Stoppard (2007) Teenage: The Creation of Youth 1875-1945, Jon Savage (2007) Fingersmith, Sarah Waters (2002) The Trial of Henry Kissinger, Christopher Hitchens (2001) Mr Wilson’s Cabinet of Wonder, Lawrence Weschler (1997) A People’s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1890-1924, Orlando Figes (1997) The… [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 12:00 am
Then again, there's a good chance you're wrong. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
L'avocate pénaliste Hannelore Cayre y faisait une peinture auvitriol de la« justicedes pauvres et des proxos », du côté de l'avocaten même temps que du côté du mis en examen. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
Lynch.Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2009.Criminal Procedure(RES)KF9619 .W43Wharton's criminal procedure. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Legal Writing 39 (2001-02). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Legal Writing 39 (2001-02). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Legal Writing 39 (2001-02). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Sox, Michael C. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Defining State-Owned Enterprises c. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:47 pm
I don't plan on reading it again. 2001: A Space Odyssey by Arthur C. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
Health Care CALL # KF9368 .L68 2001. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Here is the application, in PDF and text: NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (ELLEN SMITH, APPLICANT) (Pursuant to Section 40 of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 25 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) APPLICANT (Respondent) RESPONDENT (Appellant) TAKE NOTICE that Ellen Smith hereby applies for leave to appeal to the Court, pursuant to sections 40 and 43 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:06 pm
If you or a family member became ill with a Hepatitis A infection after consuming food and you’re interested in pursuing a legal claim, contact the Marler Clark Hepatitis A attorneys for a free case evaluation. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:25 am
[17] Persons do not carry hepatitis A long-term as with hepatitis B and C. [5, 7] Fulminant Hepatitis A Fulminant hepatitis A is a rare but devastating complication of HAV infection. [10] As many as 50% of individuals with acute liver failure may die or require emergency liver transplantation. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 6:02 am
[17] Persons do not carry hepatitis A long-term as with hepatitis B and C. [5, 7] Fulminant Hepatitis A Fulminant hepatitis A is a rare but devastating complication of HAV infection. [10] As many as 50% of individuals with acute liver failure may die or require emergency liver transplantation [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 12:19 pm
[17] Persons do not carry hepatitis A long-term as with hepatitis B and C. [5, 7] Fulminant Hepatitis A. [read post]
CANADA - Results by design: the artefactual construction of high recidivism rates for sex offenders.
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
For example, Roger Hood, Stephen Shute, Martina Feilzer, and Aidan Wilcox (2002) found that only 7% of those released from prison for a sex offence were re-convicted for another sex offence within four years. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
