Search for: "In re Kennard"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2008, 9:25 pm
Justice Kennard was part of the 4-3 majority in the Marriage Cases decision from May 15, and I was concerned that without her vote it would be difficult to prevail here. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:29 am
Unfortunately, he was removed from the boot camp for non-compliance and re-sentenced to serve fifteen years. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:06 am
Simple as that.So I thought that Justice Kennard's opinion was great. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:39 pm
Nelson & Kennard (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 1447, says the trial court must still determine the prevailing party based on the merits of the anti-SLAPP motion before awarding fees. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
The majority (led by Justice Corrigan) and dissent (authored by Justice Kennard) disagree on whether there's constitutional or prejudicial error. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:53 am
Regardless of which side you're on. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Barrett (2012) 54 Cal.4th 1081, 1114-1151, and the worst opinion was Justice Kennard's opinion In re Richards (2012) 55 Cal.4th 948, with People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 3:55 pm
If you’re available to judge one or both of these tournaments, please sign up on the google form: https://forms.gle/JpbcZehaqrGTZFUZ9Also of note on ATL, Jill Switzer's article Women Of A Certain Age: Herstories (discussing Justice Kennard). [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Justice Kennard interrupted to point out that we're not just dealing with potential witnesses, but rather with percipient witnesses. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:21 pm
It's a 4-3, with George, Kennard, Werdegar, and Moreno on top. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 3:51 pm
Today, the Supreme Court granted review in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:03 pm
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, JJ. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:32 pm
“So we’re back to a five-person, all-male court,” George announced jollily. [read post]
BREAKING NEWS -- Supreme Court of California issues same-sex marriage ruling in In re Marriage Cases
15 May 2008, 11:04 am
Kennard, Kathryn Mickle Werdegar, and Carlos R. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
" In my mind, to use an analogy different from that used by Justice Kennard, it's similar to Merrell Dow in the civil context. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:14 pm
She and George repeatedly emphasized that the other protections afforded gays by Marriage Cases will remain, with Kennard going so far as to ask Shannon Minter, of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, why he felt that "the sky has fallen in. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 3:12 pm
But I bet you're dying to know just what the actual "award" looks like, right? [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
By contrast, if they're totally reckless; well, that's another matter. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
Then there was In re Lawley on March 24th. [read post]
